Design Automation


Prevent costly design iterations by checking HDL code early in the FPGA/ASIC design cycle

9 February 2005 Design Automation

Engineers face a growing dilemma as they strive to design increasingly faster, larger and more complex circuitry into the latest FPGA or ASIC devices within the shortest possible time. Huge, complex designs require the collaboration of several engineers or engineering teams, often belonging to separate companies and distributed in different geographic locations worldwide. This raises the importance of consistent design coding style in order for teams to share code effectively, especially if multiple design flows are in use.

Often these teams will consist of experienced project leaders and designers along with less experienced junior engineers. This makes the need for consistency critical. Moreover, it is imperative that companies carefully scrutinise the planning and creation process for poor design styles, incorrect design rules, and syntax/semantic errors at the earliest possible stage before attempting to simulate or synthesise the design.

Bigger design sizes at higher speeds mean that traditional simulation cycles have become painfully prolonged. Similarly, synthesis can become a protracted and iterative process in order to achieve desired performance goals. Therefore, there is a need to maximise the productivity of potentially long EDA tool runs by ensuring that as many code errors as possible are found and fixed prior to the start of simulation and synthesis.

In order to minimise design times, 80-90% of projects will include re-work of an existing design or re-use of previously designed components or IP, whether internal or purchased. Since this trend is expected to increase, engineers need to ensure the components or subsystems are designed to be re-usable and hence conform to established design re-use rules. Through cooperative efforts in the design community and internal corporate standardisation, re-use methodology guidelines have been developed that can be checked using automated tools.

DesignAnalyst is a new tool from Mentor Graphics designed to detect and isolate a broad range of HDL design problems during the process of design creation. Its fast run-time performance and error isolation capability make it easy for designers to check their code frequently while editing their code and quickly fix the errors they find.

Included with the tool is a rule set based on the industry reference 'Re-use Methodology Manual' to check for a broad range of design errors and adherence to style guidelines. DesignAnalyst also has an easy-to-use interface for building your own rules. You can build rules using a set of parameterised base rules, which allows you to customise your rule sets without any programming. The advantage is that instead of searching through thousands of static rules, you can search for a matching base rule, adjust the parameters to suit your needs, and move to the next rule.

Figure 1. The DesignAnalyst user interface helps designers quickly isolate and fix errors
Figure 1. The DesignAnalyst user interface helps designers quickly isolate and fix errors

Some examples of rules that the tool enforces are:

* No extra or unused signals.

* Isolate or avoid gated clocks.

* Avoid internally-generated resets.

* Avoid mixed clock edges.

* No multiply-driven signals.

* Assign a value to a signal before reading it.

* Matching comparison/assignment ranges.

* Check for clock boundary crossing and synchronisation.

In today's complex designs, multiple clock domains are increasingly common, so this category of checks is one that designers most often request. Figure 2 illustrates a multiple clock domain design (B) vs a single clock domain design (A). The timing diagram below the schematics shows the resulting timing diagram that metastability effects can cause if the clock domains are not properly synchronised.

Figure 2.  Potential metastability effect caused by unsynchronised clock domains
Figure 2. Potential metastability effect caused by unsynchronised clock domains

Conclusion

In order to minimise design-to-production timescales, it is important that potential downstream problems can be identified as early in the design process as possible. Design iterations late in the design cycle can potentially cost several days. Designers today cannot afford to wait until the simulation or synthesis stages of the design process to find problems that could be identified during design entry. DesignAnalyst is a low-cost, configurable HDL design checker that can find and isolate several classes of design errors and dramatically reduce overall design time for complex FPGA and ASIC designs.



Credit(s)



Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

ARINC 429 line driver evaluation board
ASIC Design Services DSP, Micros & Memory
Holt Integrated Circuits have announced the release of the ADK-85104 Evaluation Board, a compact, ready-to-use platform designed to help engineers rapidly evaluate and characterise Holt’s HI-85104.

Read more...
ST welcomes STM32Cube AI Studio
Design Automation
STMicroelectronics has introduced STM32Cube AI Studio, a new desktop software environment designed to simplify the deployment of artificial intelligence on STM32 microcontrollers.

Read more...
NeoCortec introduces new NeoGW software
Design Automation
This is a powerful multiplatform open-source solution designed to streamline integration between the NeoMesh network and upper-level systems, whether deployed in the cloud or on-premise environments.

Read more...
Keil Studio now in VSCode
Design Automation
Keil Studio, Arm’s latest IDE, now integrates embedded development tools directly into Visual Studio Code providing features like seamless industry tool integration, version control, and a CLI for CI workflows.

Read more...
Inventec enhances design for manufacturing excellence with Siemens’ software
ASIC Design Services Manufacturing / Production Technology, Hardware & Services
Siemens recently announced that Inventec Corporation has adopted Siemens’ Valor NPI software and Process Preparation X solutions from the Siemens Xcelerator portfolio to strengthen its design-for-manufacturing efficiency.

Read more...
Quad-Apollo MxFE reference design
Design Automation
The Quad-Apollo MxFE reference design exemplifies a complete, high-performance platform for every-element direct-RF sampling digital beamforming using Analog Devices’ Apollo mixed-signal front-end technology.

Read more...
Siemens acquires Canopus AI
ASIC Design Services News
The acquisition extends Siemens’ comprehensive EDA software portfolio with computational metrology and inspection to help chipmakers solve critical technical challenges in semiconductor manufacturing.

Read more...
MIKROE signs multi-year deal with Renesas
Dizzy Enterprises Design Automation
MIKROE has signed a multi-year MCU development tool support deal with Renesas, which commits MIKROE to providing development tools for 500 of Renesas’ most popular MCUs.

Read more...
Future Electronics and SnapMagic announce CAD model integration to support faster design cycles
Future Electronics Design Automation
Engineers can now download verified symbols, footprints, and 3D models directly from supported product pages, enabling a smoother transition from component selection to PCB layout.

Read more...
Pulsonix 14.0 advances design
Design Automation
Pulsonix’s latest PCB design software platform further strengthens simulation and brings significant enhancements in mechanical-electrical 3D integration, smarter comparison tools, and enhanced usability features.

Read more...









While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd | All Rights Reserved